Two different kinds of scenario content, kept separate:
Atmospheric forcing for all regional ocean simulations: the raw CMIP6 archive and its bias-corrected counterpart, calibrated against ERA5. Model-agnostic – these diagnostics describe the forcing itself, not any particular ocean simulation.
Trend and period-change analysis of actual GETM simulation output run under a future SSP scenario – model-vs-itself (a reference period from the same run), not model-vs-observations. See Validations for the observation-comparison side.
Atmospheric forcing for all regional ocean simulations, in two forms: the raw CMIP6 archive (each model’s own published output, unmodified) and the bias-corrected version of the same fields (quantile delta mapping calibrated against ERA5 reanalysis over the historical period). The raw section below comes first – it’s the reference the bias correction is calibrated against; everything after the divider is the bias-corrected side.
Raw CMIP6 Data Meteorological forcing fields exactly as published by the source model – no bias correction applied. This is the reference the bias-corrected fields further down this page are calibrated against, fetched directly from Pangeo/GCS or ESGF (see ocean-data’s DataLoader) rather than through the bias-correction pipeline.
...
Trend and period-change analysis of actual GETM simulation output run under a future SSP scenario – model-vs-itself (a reference period from the same run), not model-vs-observations. For the atmospheric forcing these simulations are driven by, see Meteo Forcing; for observation-comparison analyses, see Validations.