Harmonic analysis of sea surface elevation compared with satellite products and tide gauge observations.

Analysis Summary

Analyzed Constituents: K1, K2, M2, N2, O1, P1, Q1, S2
Analysis Date: 2026-10-10 Satellite Product: FES2014/TPXO9

Plots

Tide Gauge Station Map

GESLA tide gauge station locations GESLA tide gauge station locations

K₁ (lunar-solar diurnal) — model amplitude and phase K₁ (lunar-solar diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

K₁ (lunar-solar diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges K₁ (lunar-solar diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

O₁ (principal lunar diurnal) — model amplitude and phase O₁ (principal lunar diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

O₁ (principal lunar diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges O₁ (principal lunar diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

P₁ (principal solar diurnal) — model amplitude and phase P₁ (principal solar diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

P₁ (principal solar diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges P₁ (principal solar diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

Q₁ (larger lunar elliptic diurnal) — model amplitude and phase Q₁ (larger lunar elliptic diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

Q₁ (larger lunar elliptic diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges Q₁ (larger lunar elliptic diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

K₂ (lunar-solar semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase K₂ (lunar-solar semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

K₂ (lunar-solar semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges K₂ (lunar-solar semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

M₂ (principal lunar semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase M₂ (principal lunar semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

M₂ (principal lunar semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges M₂ (principal lunar semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

N₂ (larger lunar elliptic semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase N₂ (larger lunar elliptic semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

N₂ (larger lunar elliptic semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges N₂ (larger lunar elliptic semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

S₂ (principal solar semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase S₂ (principal solar semi-diurnal) — model amplitude and phase

S₂ (principal solar semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges S₂ (principal solar semi-diurnal) — amplitude/phase comparison with GESLA tide gauges

Station amplitude/phase comparison — diurnal constituents Station amplitude/phase comparison — diurnal constituents

Station amplitude/phase comparison — semi-diurnal constituents Station amplitude/phase comparison — semi-diurnal constituents

Tide Gauge Station Comparison

Compared with 89 tide gauge stations.

Station Results (Sample)

stationlatloncountryyears_of_obsconstituentmodel_ampobs_ampamp_diffmodel_phaobs_phapha_diff
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000M22.5782.695-0.117-117.861142.046100.093
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000S20.9771.005-0.027-171.773-172.2540.480
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000N20.5150.533-0.018-41.587123.796-165.383
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000K20.2790.287-0.008-43.947-174.564130.616
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000K10.0870.0820.00566.25082.046-15.796
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000O10.0650.073-0.00895.083-28.193123.276
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000P10.0290.0280.001116.58372.69843.885
roscoff-54-fra-refmar48.718-3.966FRA53.000Q10.0200.022-0.002139.300-72.558-148.141
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000M23.5543.674-0.119-81.421177.534101.045
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000S21.3831.434-0.051-129.993-132.0902.098
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000N20.6980.717-0.018-1.635161.366-163.000
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000K20.4000.410-0.010-1.941-134.593132.652
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000K10.1030.0950.00982.02895.529-13.501
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000O10.0730.082-0.009109.270-15.478124.748
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000P10.0340.035-0.001133.14887.75645.392
saint_malo-410-fra-refmar48.641-2.028FRA35.000Q10.0220.024-0.003155.483-57.656-146.861
st_marys-stm-gbr-da_idh49.918-6.317GBR9.000M21.6501.758-0.108-129.974131.22298.805
st_marys-stm-gbr-da_idh49.918-6.317GBR9.000S20.5800.603-0.023172.489172.1920.297
st_marys-stm-gbr-da_idh49.918-6.317GBR9.000N20.3160.344-0.028-56.343111.930-168.273
st_marys-stm-gbr-da_idh49.918-6.317GBR9.000K20.1660.172-0.006-59.830169.735130.435

Download Full Table

Methodology

Harmonic Analysis

Tidal constituents extracted using UTide harmonic analysis package. Analysis performed on high-frequency model output (10-15 min resolution) over a minimum period of 60 days.

Satellite Comparison

Model results compared with satellite-derived tidal products:

  • FES2014: Finite Element Solution 2014 (1/16° resolution)
  • TPXO9: OSU Tidal Prediction Software (1/30° resolution)

Satellite data regridded to model grid using conservative interpolation.


← Back to NSe